AbstractObjectiveThis study analyzed differences in the wage penalty for parental caregiving between early Baby Boomers and the previous generation.BackgroundResearch has explored the association between parental caregiving and women's labor market outcomes, but few studies have conducted cross‐cohort analyses.MethodThis study used nationally representative data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and compared two cohorts of individuals aged 50 to 64. One cohort was born between 1931 and 1941, and the other was born between 1948 and 1953. The 1994 to 2012 waves of the HRS were pooled, and multivariate fixed effects regression models were used to estimate the associations among birth cohort, parental caregiving, and women's and men's log hourly wages.ResultsIntense parental caregiving was associated with a 4.8% reduction in women's wages. Baby Boom women did not fare better than their predecessors. Moreover, despite a substantial increase in Baby Boom men's parental care, the association between caregiving and their labor market outcomes was negligible. Similar to their predecessors, married and unmarried Baby Boom men did not pay wage penalties for parental caregiving.ConclusionThese results extend our understanding of the gendered life course and suggest that parental caregiving may contribute to older women's economic disadvantage.
